The U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in six cases during the first week of its October 2025 term, including in disputes over federal candidates' ability to challenge state election laws, Colorado's ban on conversion therapy, and the ability of a landlord to sue the U.S. Postal Service for allegedly refusing to deliver mail.
Washington, D.C, October 4 — Advocacy groups the American Immigration Council and the National Immigrant Justice Center (NIJC) filed an emergency motion on October 4, seeking to enforce a 2021 court ruling (in the Garcia Ramirez v. ICE case) that prevents ICE from illegally locking up unaccompanied immigrant children in adult detention centers once they turn 18.
The Council and NIJC filed the motion after multiple documented cases emerged in which ICE resumed its practice of seeking to transfer immigrant children who entered the U.S. alone into adult detention facilities once they turned 18, in violation of the permanent injunction in the Garcia Ramirez case.
“The permanent injunction made clear that ICE cannot automatically transfer young people to adult detention centers simply because they have turned 18,” said Michelle Lapointe, legal director at the American Immigration Council. “Locking up these young people in ICE jails rife with overcrowding and hazardous conditions, and far from their support systems, does nothing to make our communities safer, it only inflicts more harm on vulnerable youth.”
When children under 18 enter the United States alone, they are placed in shelters run by the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) and are generally released to family members or other vetted sponsors in the U.S., not to ICE detention centers. These policies recognize that children need care and support, not punishment.
Under the Garcia Ramirez court ruling that resulted from yearslong litigation by the NIJC and the Council and a lengthy bench trial, once these youths turn 18, ICE must consider placement in the least restrictive setting, like an alternative-to-detention program, rather than throwing them into immigration detention.
“ICE’s attempt to expand the detention of immigrant youth is a direct violation of the courts, which explicitly requires the agency to consider safe, less restrictive alternatives to detention,” said Mark Fleming, associate director of litigation at the National Immigrant Justice Center. “We will not allow the government to turn back the clock and return to a practice that the courts have already found unlawful.”
The number of people in immigration detention has reached record highs, fueling overcrowding and abusive conditions. The Trump administration is weaponizing the threat of prolonged confinement in these dangerous facilities to coerce people into giving up their legal rights and accepting deportation. This pressure campaign is being reinforced by new policies such as a program offering financial payments to unaccompanied youths if they agree to leave the country.
“The law is clear: ICE must use safe, less restrictive alternatives, not default to jailing young people indefinitely,” said Marie Silver, managing attorney for NIJC’s Immigrant Children’s Protection Project. “These kids came here seeking safety and hope. They deserve a chance to be free and reunify with family and community members, attend school, and work with their lawyers to have their day in court. Trapping them in dangerous and degrading conditions in immigration detention is compounding their trauma in a cruel and unnecessary way.”
The post Legal Groups File Emergency Motion to Stop ICE from Jailing Immigrant Teens in Adult Detention appeared first on American Immigration Council.
The First Circuit on Friday upheld blocks on President Donald Trump's executive order aiming to limit birthright citizenship, ruling in a sweeping 100-page opinion that the president's order is likely unconstitutional.
After a busy summer of emergency rulings, the U.S. Supreme Court will kick off its October 2025 term Monday with only a few big-ticket cases on its docket — over presidential authorities, transgender athletes and election law — in what might be a strategically slow start to a potentially momentous term. Here, Law360 looks at four of the most important cases on the court's docket so far.
A spokesperson for the Federal Emergency Management Agency confirmed Friday that it awarded Florida $608 million in reimbursement funds for building and running mass detention centers, including the so-called "Alligator Alcatraz" facility in Big Cypress National Preserve.
The U.S. Supreme Court is poised to confront a slate of divisive issues in its upcoming term that begins Monday, with voting rights, transgender equality, religious freedom, immigration detention, and criminal procedure all on the docket.
The U.S. Supreme Court for a second time cleared the Trump administration to undo temporary protected status designations for hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans, despite lower court rulings concluding it acted unlawfully, sparking a fierce dissent by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson.
Labor unions, healthcare providers, schools and religious groups filed suit Friday in California federal court to block the Trump administration's recent action slapping a $100,000 fee for H-1B visas, saying the new price tag was unconstitutionally ordered and will hurt more than just America's tech industry.
Twenty years after John Roberts became the 17th chief justice of the United States, he faces a U.S. Supreme Court term that's looking transformative for the country and its institutions. How Justice Roberts and his colleagues navigate mounting distrust in the judiciary and set the boundaries of presidential authority appear increasingly likely to define his time leading the court.
D.C. Circuit judges seemed split Friday over whether an information-sharing agreement between immigration authorities and the IRS complies with taxpayer privacy protections, with one judge noting during oral arguments that the government immigration arm requesting the tax information appears unauthorized to make the requests.